Topic-based authoring uses a Component Content Management System (CCMS). CCMSs like MadCap Flare allow users to create and edit reusable “chunks” of content from a single source and distribute that content to online or in-print channels.
Tech Company is a server manufacturer with software and hardware installation guides published exclusively in print PDF format.
To boost customer service, Tech Company reached out to content strategists, listing 5 major objectives to revamp their content and increase brand loyalty and market attractiveness:
Our team tackled Chapter 1 of Tech Company’s software and hardware installation guides, as well as the software guide’s Appendix A and the hardware guide’s Appendix B, as proof of concept to update Tech Company’s support documentation.
Tech Company had published their PDFs with a CCMS, MadCap Flare. However, we needed to increase the company’s efficient use of single-source content to facilitate Tech Company’s goals. The two major challenges were:
Our team tackled these challenges to create a pilot project that demonstrates our capacity to bridge the gap between where Tech Company was and where it wants to be.
Our team’s proof of concept accomplished the following key outcomes:
Tech Company provided our team with a foundation to build upon. To meet Tech Company’s needs most effectively and efficiently, my team prioritized content organization, availability and searchability, and cohesive CSS design.
Using Jorsick guidelines, we identified each article as a Concept, Task, or Reference.
Isolating articles by topic types improved Tech Company’s capacity to develop consistent modular content, and prepared it to use that content for translation purposes (Objective 4).
Tech Company would often combine particular topic types (e.g., tasks with concepts), which is challenging for the reader because it inhibits their ability to identify the content succinctly.
Solving the first problem, publishing to HTML, was simple enough; however, the second problem required a more significant overhaul of Tech Company’s content. For example, Tech Company’s content on its return policy mixed content type and task type formats.
The team needed to separate those types into distinct, reusable chunks.
Above, the first two paragraphs function as Concept Type content; whereas the information beginning with “To return a component” qualifies as a Task Type.
Grouping topic types also inhibited Tech Company’s ability to create modular information, or “chunks.” Thus, separating content by type satisfied Objectives 1, 2, and 5.
One major problem Tech Company faced was inconsistent tone or voice between articles with different authors. To resolve this issue, we implemented to tactics:
So, after separating content into types, we created Jorsick-inspired templates for each type.
These templates used structured authoring to identify required or optional elements for each topic type.
Incorporating structured authoring improves the consistency of Tech Company’s content, which benefits all 5 of its major objectives.
To satisfy Objective 1, we created a searchable HTML online database.
This database included the first chapters of Tech Company’s hardware and software installation guides, as well as the software guide’s Appendix A and the hardware guide’s Appendix B.
Tech Company’s Installation Guides featured consistent document design. My team updated fonts from serifs to sans serifs, since research suggests these font types are easier to read for individuals with poor eyesight and/or dyslexia. However, stylistically, sans serifs are currently perceived to be more clean and modern, as well.
Ultimately, the team increased Tech Company’s capacity to create consistent, organized, available, and searchable content, satisfying each of its five objectives.